Summary
This document consists primarily of a December 2, 2025 letter from the Village of Endicott opposing IBM’s renewed request to stay discovery pending resolution of IBM’s motion to dismiss. The Village argues that a stay would cause prejudice and that the complexity of the environmental contamination claims supports proceeding with discovery. The document also includes a December 3, 2025 court order stating that the action is stayed pending resolution of the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint.
Holdings
- The action, including discovery, is stayed pending resolution of Defendant's motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint.
Questions Presented
- Whether discovery should be stayed pending resolution of IBM's motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Transunion Corp. v. PepsiCo, Inc., 811 F.2d 127, 130 (2d Cir. 1987)(followed)
- In re Chase Manhattan Corp. Securities Litigation, 1991 WL 79432, at *1, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6136, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 7, 1991)(followed)
- Hachette Distribution, Inc. v. Hudson County News Co., 136 F.R.D. 356, 358 (E.D.N.Y. 1991)(followed)
- Moran v. Flaherty, No. 92 CIV. 3200 (PKL), 1992 WL 276913, at *1-*2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…