Summary
This Report and Recommendation recommends dismissing Wilfred Anderson’s pro se civil action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The recommendation relies on the plaintiff’s failure to comply with court notices and an order requiring him to cure the filing-fee deficiency.
Holdings
- The magistrate judge recommended that the action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to comply with the filing-fee requirement and the Court's order despite receiving notice and an express warning of the consequence.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis after notice and a court order.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 49 (1991)(followed)
- Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-32 (1962)(followed)
- Knoll v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 176 F.3d 359, 363 (6th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Stough v. Mayville Community Schools, 138 F.3d 612, 615 (6th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Steward v. City of Jackson, 8 F. App'x 294, 296-97 (6th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108, 110 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d 981, 994 (6th Cir. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…