GS Holistic, LLC v. Stars Wireless and Smoke LLC, d/b/a Stars Wireless & Smoke Shop

GS Holistic · United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Cincinnati · January 23, 2026 · No. 1:23-cv-641

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio partially granted GS Holistic, LLC's motion for default judgment against Stars Wireless and Smoke LLC, awarding $150,000 in statutory damages and imposing injunctive and destruction-related relief for alleged willful trademark infringement. The court set aside the clerk's entry of default as to individual defendant Mahmoud Alili under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c), concluding that the balance of relevant factors and the preference for decisions on the merits supported relief. Alili's motion requesting clarification was overruled as moot.

Holdings

  1. Stars Wireless could not proceed pro se and, because it failed to obtain counsel after being ordered to do so, default judgment was properly sustained against it.
  2. Default judgment was warranted against Stars Wireless because the well-pleaded allegations were deemed admitted and the undisputed evidence established liability for selling counterfeit goods bearing GS Holistic's trademarks, including willful violations of the Lanham Act.
  3. A $150,000 statutory-damages award, calculated as $50,000 per infringed trademark, was connected to the harm shown by the evidence and sufficient to deter future infringement.
  4. Stars Wireless was enjoined from purchasing, selling, or using the counterfeit products or other counterfeit Stundenglass products, and was ordered to destroy such products and certify the destruction.
  5. Alili demonstrated good cause under Rule 55(c) to set aside the entry of default because his conduct was dilatory but not reckless, the prejudice to GS Holistic was minimal, and the strong preference for decisions on the merits outweighed the absence of a demonstrated meritorious defense.
  6. Alili's motion requesting clarification of facts in the complaint was overruled as moot.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether default judgment should be entered against Stars Wireless for failing to obtain counsel, answer the complaint, or otherwise participate in the action.
  2. Whether statutory damages of $150,000 and equitable relief were warranted against Stars Wireless for willful trademark infringement and false designation of origin.
  3. Whether Alili established good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) to set aside the Clerk's entry of default.
  4. Whether Alili's motion requesting clarification of facts in the complaint should be granted.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (14)

  • Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993)(followed)
  • Coach, Inc. v. Cellular Planet, No. 2:09-cv-241, 2010 WL 2572113, *2 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 22, 2010)(followed)
  • Wildlife Exp. Corp. v. Carol Wright Sales, Inc., 18 F.3d 502, 511 (7th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Yazan's Serv. Plaza, Inc., No. 05-70804, 2007 WL 1834714, *4 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2007)(followed)
  • Microsoft Corp. v. McGee, 490 F. Supp. 2d 874, 882 (S.D. Ohio June 22, 2010)(followed)
  • JUUL Labs, Inc. v. FLI High, LLC, 2021 WL 3633512, *2 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 17, 2021)(followed)
  • EVO Brands, LLC v. Al Khalifa Grp. LLC, 657 F. Supp. 3d 1312, 1321 (C.D. Cal. 2023)(followed)
  • Antoine v. Atlas Turner, Inc., 66 F.3d 105, 110 (6th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Stark Carpet Corp. v. Stark Carpet & Flooring Installation Corp., 954 F. Supp. 2d 145, 154 (E.D.N.Y. 2013)(followed)
  • Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…