MidFirst Bank v. Brandi Berry, et al.

MidFirst Bank v. Berry · United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division · December 30, 2025 · No. 2:25-CV-00072

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas adopted a magistrate judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation after no party filed objections. The court granted the parties’ joint motion for entry of a second amended agreed order concerning the interests of two minors and stated that the agreed order would be entered separately.

Holdings

  1. When no timely objection is filed, the district court need only determine whether the magistrate judge's Memorandum and Recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
  2. The court adopted the Memorandum and Recommendation in its entirety and granted the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Second Amended Agreed Order as to the Interests of Minors G.S. and B.S.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's Memorandum and Recommendation when no timely objection was filed.
  2. Whether the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Second Amended Agreed Order as to the Interests of Minors G.S. and B.S. should be granted.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…