Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas adopts a magistrate judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation in Jim Hargrave’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Because no objections were filed and the recommendation was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the court dismisses the petition and denies a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- When no timely objection is filed, the district court need only determine whether the magistrate judge's Memorandum and Recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
- The court adopted the Memorandum and Recommendation and dismissed the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
- The court denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's Memorandum and Recommendation was clearly erroneous or contrary to law in recommending dismissal of the § 2254 petition.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should be denied.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam)(followed)
- Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…