Summary
This Proposed Findings and Recommendation addresses a pro se plaintiff's failure to serve process and respond to an order to show cause in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a Fourth Amendment violation. The magistrate judge recommends dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.
Holdings
- The magistrate judge found that dismissal with prejudice was proper under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to effect timely service, failed to file proof of service, and failed to respond to the order to show cause despite multiple express warnings.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.
- Whether the Fourth Circuit's factors for dismissal for failure to prosecute support dismissal where a pro se plaintiff failed to effect service after an express warning and then failed to respond to an order to show cause.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Doyle v. Murray, 938 F.2d 33, 34 (4th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Dove v. CODESCO, 569 F.2d 807, 810 (4th Cir. 1978)(followed)
- Hillig v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 916 F.2d 171, 174 (4th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Attkisson v. Holder, 925 F.3d 606, 626 (4th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985)(followed)
- Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846 (4th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…