Summary
A magistrate judge recommends sua sponte dismissal without prejudice of an immigration detainee’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition for failure to prosecute after court mail was returned as undeliverable and the petitioner failed to provide a new address. The recommendation relies on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the court’s inherent docket-control authority, and applicable objection procedures under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule 72(b).
Holdings
- The magistrate judge recommended that the petition be dismissed without prejudice, sua sponte, for failure to prosecute because the petitioner failed to provide a current address after the court’s order was returned as undeliverable.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petition should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute when the petitioner failed to maintain a current mailing address and did not comply with an order to file amended pleadings.
- Whether the court may dismiss the action sua sponte under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and its inherent power to control its docket.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Link v. Wabash Railroad Company, 370 U.S. 626, 82 S. Ct. 1386 (1962)(followed)
- Rogers v. Kroger Company, 669 F.2d 317, 320-321 (5th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- Douglas v. U.S.A.A., 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…