Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted Hasan Bagator’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition insofar as it sought an individualized bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). The court overruled the respondents’ objections, directed that a bond hearing be conducted by April 27, 2026, and ordered release if the hearing was not provided or was denied on specified mandatory-detention grounds.
Holdings
- Petitioner was eligible for an individualized bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), and the petition was granted to the extent it sought that hearing.
- Respondents' objections were overruled because they did not establish a basis to reject the magistrate judge's recommendation.
- Respondents were ordered to provide Petitioner with the statutory process under § 1226(a), including a bond hearing before an immigration judge by April 27, 2026; failure to provide the hearing, or refusal to conduct it based on Matter of Yajure Hurtado or Matter of Q. Li, would require immediate release.
Questions Presented
- Whether Petitioner was eligible for an individualized bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Whether Respondents' objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation should be sustained.
- What relief should issue if the Government failed to provide the required bond hearing or relied on cited immigration decisions to deny a hearing.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (3)
- Calzado Diaz v. Noem, No. 3:25-cv-458, 2025 WL 3628480 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2025)(followed)
- Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I&N Dec. 216 (BIA 2025)(considered)
- Matter of Q. Li, 29 I&N Dec. 66 (BIA 2025)(considered)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…