Larry Gene Harless, Jr. v. Michelle Boyd et al.

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia denies Larry Gene Harless Jr.’s motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Michelle Boyd and Johnny Rosenbaum. The court concludes that Harless failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, a favorable balance of equities, or that an injunction would serve the public interest.

Holdings

1. Plaintiff was not entitled to preliminary injunctive relief because he failed to clearly show that he was likely to succeed on the merits, likely to suffer irreparable harm, that the balance of equities favored relief, or that relief was in the public interest.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Plaintiff was entitled to a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65.

Disposition

other