Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia denies Timothy R. Derosha’s motion to dismiss a minor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 substantive due process claim. The claim arises from an alleged delay in permitting the minor to receive emergency medical treatment while a state trooper detained her father at gunpoint in a hospital parking lot. The court concludes at the pleading stage that the allegations plausibly establish conscience-shocking conduct and declines to apply qualified immunity on the present record.
Holdings
- At the motion-to-dismiss stage, the alleged conduct was properly evaluated under the deliberate-indifference standard rather than the more demanding intent-to-harm standard because the alleged constitutional injury occurred after the pursuit, when Derosha allegedly had time for deliberation.
- M.M. plausibly alleged that Derosha acted with deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
- The complaint plausibly alleged that Derosha violated M.M.'s constitutional right by detaining her and delaying necessary medical care despite knowledge of her serious medical emergency.
- The constitutional right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation, so Derosha was not entitled to qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage.
Questions Presented
- Whether M.M.'s allegations plausibly stated a Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim based on deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs.
- Whether the allegations supported applying the deliberate-indifference rather than intent-to-harm standard to the conscience-shocking inquiry.
- Whether Derosha was entitled to qualified immunity because the alleged conduct did not violate a constitutional right.
- Whether the asserted right was clearly established when Derosha allegedly detained M.M. and delayed her access to emergency medical care.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (38)
- Mason v. Machine Zone, Inc., 851 F.3d 315, 317 n.2 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Goines v. Valley Community Services Board, 822 F.3d 159, 164, 166 (4th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 557, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Francis v. Giacomelli, 588 F.3d 186, 193 (4th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Secretary of State for Defence v. Trimble Navigation Ltd., 484 F.3d 700, 705 (4th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 244 (4th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Wag More Dogs, LLC v. Cozart, 680 F.3d 359, 365 (4th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Giarratano v. Johnson, 521 F.3d 298, 302 (4th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Columbia v. Haley, 738 F.3d 107, 116 (4th Cir. 2013)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 38.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…