Randall Lee Stacel v. Chatham Jail, et al.

Stacel · United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Roanoke Division · March 31, 2026 · No. 7:25CV00723

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia screened Randall Lee Stacel’s pro se civil rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court dismissed without prejudice the claims against Chatham Jail and Chatham, Virginia, because they are not persons subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, while claims against Sgt. Worley and Officer Johnson remained.

Holdings

  1. Chatham Jail and Chatham, Virginia, are not persons subject to suit under § 1983 and therefore cannot be defendants on the claims alleged.
  2. The claims against Chatham Jail and Chatham, Virginia, were dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court was required to screen the in forma pauperis complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
  2. Whether Chatham Jail and Chatham, Virginia, are persons subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
  3. Whether the claims against Chatham Jail and Chatham, Virginia, should be dismissed for failure to state a claim.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Eriline Co. S.A. v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 648, 656 (4th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972)(followed)
  • Cooper v. Sheehan, 735 F.3d 153, 158 (4th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…