Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia

No. 7:24-cv-00909 (W.D. Va. May 20, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Roanoke Division · May 20, 2026 · No. 7:24-cv-00909

Summary

The court dismissed Daryll Keith Shumake’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court held that Shumake failed to allege specific facts showing that he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury when he filed the action. His claims concerned disability accommodations, an alleged delay in medical attention, and a prior fall while incarcerated.

Holdings

  1. A prisoner with three or more qualifying dismissals may proceed without prepayment of the filing fee only by alleging sufficient and specific facts establishing that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time of filing; vague, speculative, or conclusory allegations are insufficient.
  2. Because Shumake did not satisfy the imminent-danger exception, the action was dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) barred Shumake from proceeding without prepayment of the filing fee because he had at least three qualifying prior dismissals.
  2. Whether Shumake alleged sufficient and specific facts to invoke § 1915(g)'s exception for a prisoner under imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time of filing.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (11)

  • Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 7:17-cv-00214, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101686 (W.D. Va. June 29, 2017)(applied)
  • Shumake v. Smith, No. 7:12-cv-00174, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54521 (W.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2012)(applied)
  • Shumake v. Harvey, No. 7:05-cv-00802, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97572 (W.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2006)(applied)
  • Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 25-6525 (4th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025)(applied)
  • Shumake v. Wallens Ridge State Prison, No. 08-7500 (4th Cir. Dec. 11, 2008)(applied)
  • Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez, 590 U.S. 595 (2020)(applied)
  • Hall v. United States, 44 F.4th 218, 224 (4th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Warner, 200 F. App'x 270, 272 (4th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Martin v. Shelton, 319 F.3d 1048, 1050 (8th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Holley v. Combs, 134 F.4th 142, 144-46 (4th Cir. 2025)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…