Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia denied Christian Thomas Nealson’s motion requesting a three-judge panel and an order requiring his release from incarceration. The court held that 28 U.S.C. § 2284 did not authorize a three-judge panel in this § 1983 action and that habeas corpus, rather than § 1983, is the exclusive federal remedy for a state prisoner seeking release from confinement.
Holdings
- A three-judge panel was not required because Nealson did not challenge the constitutionality or apportionment of a congressional district or statewide legislative body and identified no other statute authorizing such a panel.
- An order requiring a state prisoner’s actual release from confinement is not available under § 1983; habeas corpus is the exclusive federal remedy for that relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court was required or authorized to convene a three-judge panel under 28 U.S.C. § 2284.
- Whether an order requiring a state prisoner’s release from incarceration is available as relief in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Griffin v. Baltimore Police Department, 804 F.3d 692, 694-95 (4th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 487-90 (1973)(followed)
- Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 525 (2011)(followed)
- Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…