Summary
The court granted defendants’ motion to compel discovery responses from a self-represented state prisoner who refused to identify witnesses during his deposition. The court ordered plaintiff to provide, within ten days, a declaration identifying each known witness and providing available identifying and contact information. The court warned that failure to disclose the information could result in exclusion of witness testimony.
Holdings
- A party may move for an order compelling a witness to answer a question posed during a deposition, and defendants were entitled to seek such relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(3)(B)(i).
- The names, nicknames, locations, and contact information of witnesses known to plaintiff concerning the incident were discoverable, including witnesses plaintiff might call to provide unfavorable as well as favorable testimony.
- A party's self-represented status is not grounds for refusing to produce discovery.
- Failure to adequately disclose the ordered witness information may result in exclusion of the witnesses' testimony if plaintiff later attempts to introduce it.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendants were entitled to an order compelling plaintiff to answer deposition questions and disclose information concerning witnesses to the incident.
- Whether plaintiff's pro se status or desire to obtain counsel justified refusing to provide the requested discovery.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- V5 Techs v. Switch, Ltd., 334 F.R.D. 615, 618 (D. Nev. 2020)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…