Summary
The Utah Supreme Court reconsidered its prior interlocutory decision concerning whether a national bank acting as a trustee in a Utah foreclosure was governed by Utah law under the National Bank Act. The court held that the term “located” in 12 U.S.C. § 92a(a) is ambiguous and that the Comptroller of the Currency’s interpretation defining the relevant state was entitled to deference. The court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- Exceptional circumstances permitted the court to revisit Sundquist I because the prior decision was clearly erroneous and superior, more focused briefing revealed the need to correct the error and avoid an unjust result or unwise precedent.
- The term "located" in 12 U.S.C. § 92a(a) is ambiguous and cannot be resolved solely from the statute's plain language.
- Congress delegated to the Comptroller of the Currency authority to interpret the term "located," and the Comptroller's interpretation is entitled to deference because it is a reasonable construction of an ambiguous statute.
- The National Bank Act clearly expresses Congress's intent to alter the usual federal-state balance by permitting national banks to exercise fiduciary powers according to the law of the state in which the bank is located.
- A trustee under a deed of trust falls within the term "trustee" or otherwise acts in a fiduciary capacity for purposes of 12 U.S.C. § 92a(a), and the Comptroller's interpretation to that effect is reasonable and entitled to deference.
- The district court must apply 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(d) to determine where ReconTrust was located and then apply the law of that jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether exceptional circumstances permitted the Utah Supreme Court to reconsider its prior decision in the same case under the law-of-the-case doctrine.
- Whether the term "located" in 12 U.S.C. § 92a(a) is ambiguous.
- Whether Congress delegated to the Comptroller of the Currency authority to interpret the term "located" for purposes of national-bank fiduciary activities.
- Whether the Comptroller's interpretation of where a national bank acts in a fiduciary capacity is a reasonable construction of the National Bank Act.
- Whether a trustee under a deed of trust falls within the term "trustee" or otherwise acts in a fiduciary capacity under 12 U.S.C. § 92a(a).
- Where ReconTrust is located under the Comptroller's regulatory standard.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (20)
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Sundquist, 2013 UT 45, 311 P.3d 1004(overruled)
- Sundquist II, 134 S. Ct. 475 (2014)(not_followed)
- Thurston v. Box Elder Cty., 892 P.2d 1034, 1038-39 (Utah 1995)(followed)
- Gildea v. Guardian Title Co. of Utah, 2001 UT 75, ¶ 9, 31 P.3d 543(followed)
- Messenger v. Anderson, 225 U.S. 436, 444 (1912)(followed)
- FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 154, 159-61 (2000)(distinguished)
- Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 460-61 (1991)(followed)
- Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-44 (1984)(followed)
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 512 U.S. 218, 229-34 (1994)(followed)
- Wachovia Bank v. Schmidt, 546 U.S. 303, 313 (2006)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…