State v. Joshua Boyer

2018 VT 62, 192 A.3d 1270 · Supreme Court of Vermont · June 14, 2018 · No. 2018-182

Summary

The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Joshua Boyer’s motion for release into a pretrial home detention program under 13 V.S.A. § 7554b. The court held that the trial court properly considered the statutory factors specific to Boyer, including the seriousness of the charges, his history of violent convictions and supervision violations, and risks to third parties and public safety.

Court
Supreme Court of Vermont
Writing for the Court
Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice; Marilyn S. Skoglund, Associate Justice; Beth Robinson, Associate Justice
Jurisdiction
Vermont
Decision date
June 14, 2018
Docket number
2018-182
Procedural posture
Defendant appealed the Superior Court's denial of his motion for release into the pretrial home detention program under 13 V.S.A. § 7554b.
Standard of review
The Supreme Court reviewed the denial of bail or home detention for abuse of discretion and affirmed if the decision was reasonable. Because the case was governed by 13 V.S.A. § 7553, incarceration rather than release was the norm, and defendant bore the burden of proving that home detention was appropriate.
Precedential value
Published Vermont Supreme Court opinion; precedential
Parties
Joshua Boyer v. State of Vermont
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

bailcriminal procedureappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

Criminal procedureBail and pretrial detentionAppellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying defendant's motion for release into the home detention program.
  2. Whether the trial court impermissibly based its denial on generalized concerns about the Department of Corrections' administration of the home detention monitoring program rather than on factors specific to defendant under 13 V.S.A. § 7554b(b).

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not impermissibly base its decision on the administration of the home detention program; it considered information about the program but grounded its denial in the statutory factors specific to defendant and the proposed placement.
  2. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for home detention.

Key quotations

Although the court must consider the risk to public safety in placing a defendant on home detention, we do not view this consideration to include second-guessing how the commissioner administers the home detention program. (¶ 10)
Because defendant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for home detention, we affirm. (¶ 12)

Factual background

Joshua Boyer was arrested on allegations that he repeatedly sexually assaulted his fourteen-year-old daughter and was charged with aggravated sexual assault of a child, aggravated assault, and aggravated sexual assault of a child with serious injury. The trial court held him without bail after arraignment. Boyer sought release to his mother-in-law's residence under Vermont's home detention program, but the court found significant concerns based on the seriousness of the charges, Boyer's prior violent convictions and supervision violations, and risks to third parties and public safety.

Procedural history

After defendant was arrested and initially released on bail, the trial court held him without bail under 13 V.S.A. § 7553(a). Defendant twice presented evidence supporting release to his mother-in-law's residence under the home detention program. The trial court denied the motion after analyzing the statutory factors, and the Vermont Supreme Court affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…