In re Alison McCarthy

2025 Vt. 23 · Supreme Court of Vermont · April 24, 2025 · No. 25-AP-106

Summary

The Vermont Supreme Court granted a petition by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for the immediate interim suspension of attorney Alison McCarthy’s license. McCarthy repeatedly failed to respond to requests for information regarding a client complaint alleging professional misconduct, violating Vermont Rule of Professional Conduct 8.1(b). The Court determined that her lack of cooperation impaired the disciplinary investigation and presented a substantial threat to the public, justifying interim suspension under Administrative Order 9.

Court
Supreme Court of Vermont
Writing for the Court
Paul L. Reiber; Harold E. Eaton, Jr.; Karen R. Carroll; William D. Cohen; Nancy J. Waples
Jurisdiction
Vermont
Decision date
April 24, 2025
Docket number
25-AP-106
Procedural posture
Original jurisdiction (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)
Precedential value
published
Disposition
other

Topics

administrative law

Practice areas

administrative lawprofessional responsibility

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the requirements of Administrative Order 9, Rule 22(A) for an interim suspension are satisfied given McCarthy's failure to cooperate with the disciplinary investigation.

Holdings

  1. The Court held that the requirements are satisfied and therefore an interim suspension of McCarthy's law license is appropriate.

Key quotations

The purpose of an interim suspension is to quickly protect the public from harm

Factual background

Attorney Alison McCarthy was repeatedly requested by Disciplinary Counsel to provide a written response to a client complaint. She failed to respond despite multiple extensions, did not appear at a hearing, and thus was deemed to have willfully refused to cooperate with the investigation.

Procedural history

Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition for immediate interim suspension of attorney Alison McCarthy under Administrative Order 9, Rule 22(A). The Court held a hearing, the respondent failed to appear or respond, and the Court concluded the statutory requirements for an interim suspension were met.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…