Summary
The Supreme Court of Virginia considered whether Chapter 78 of the 2002 Acts of Assembly, which validated and apportioned tangible personal property taxes following Clifton Forge's reversion from an independent city to town status, violated the Virginia Constitution. The Court held that the special act was authorized by Article VII, § 2, did not violate constitutional uniformity requirements, was not impermissibly retroactive, and did not conflict with Article VII, § 7. The judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the taxpayers' petition was affirmed.
Holdings
- Chapter 78 did not violate Article IV, § 14 because the special act was specifically authorized by Article VII, §§ 1 and 2, which permit special legislation concerning the organization, government, and powers of local governments, including taxation and assessment.
- Chapter 78 did not violate the constitutional requirement that taxes be uniform upon the same class of subjects within the territorial limits of the taxing authority.
- The retroactive application of Chapter 78 was not unconstitutional because the ex post facto prohibition applies only to criminal proceedings, and the curative legislation was not arbitrary, did not disturb vested rights, did not impair contractual obligations, and did not violate due process.
- Chapter 78 did not violate Article VII, § 7 because it did not enact a local ordinance, impose a tax, or set a tax rate; it validated existing assessments and levies and established short tax years to accommodate the change in governmental structure.
Questions Presented
- Whether Chapter 78 of the 2002 Acts of Assembly was unconstitutional special or local legislation under Article IV, § 14 of the Constitution of Virginia.
- Whether Chapter 78 violated the uniformity requirement for property taxation in Article X, § 1 of the Constitution of Virginia.
- Whether the retroactive application of Chapter 78 violated the ex post facto prohibition or other constitutional protections.
- Whether Chapter 78 violated Article VII, § 7 of the Constitution of Virginia concerning ordinances imposing taxes.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Board of Supervisors v. Telecommunications Indus., 246 Va. 472, 436 S.E.2d 442 (1993)(followed)
- R. Cross, Inc. v. City of Newport News, 217 Va. 202, 228 S.E.2d 113 (1976)(followed)
- Pulliam v. Coastal Emergency Servs., 257 Va. 1, 509 S.E.2d 307 (1999)(followed)
- Shelor Motor Co. v. Miller, 261 Va. 473, 544 S.E.2d 345 (2001)(followed)
- Fallon Florist v. City of Roanoke, 190 Va. 564, 58 S.E.2d 316 (1950)(followed)
- City of Portsmouth v. Weiss, 145 Va. 94, 133 S.E. 781 (1926)(followed)
- Pierce v. Dennis, 205 Va. 478, 138 S.E.2d 6 (1964)(followed)
- Infants v. Virginia Hous. Dev. Auth., 221 Va. 659, 272 S.E.2d 649 (1980)(followed)
- Huffman v. Commonwealth, 210 Va. 530, 172 S.E.2d 788 (1970)(followed)
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Commonwealth, 206 Va. 517, 145 S.E.2d 227 (1965)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…