Alcoy v. Valley Nursing Homes, Inc., 272 Va. 37

630 S.E.2d 301 (2006) · Supreme Court of Virginia · June 8, 2006 · No. Record No. 051701

Summary

The Supreme Court of Virginia considered whether negligence and sexual assault and battery claims arising from a nursing home's alleged failure to provide adequate staffing, visitor screening, and security were subject to Virginia's Medical Malpractice Act. The court held that the alleged administrative, personnel, and security omissions did not constitute health care or professional services under the Act. It reversed the circuit court's judgment and remanded for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. Claims alleging that a nursing home failed to protect a resident from sexual assault through inadequate personnel, visitor screening, and facility security are not subject to Virginia's Medical Malpractice Act when the alleged omissions concern administrative, personnel, and security decisions rather than health care or professional services rendered or that should have been rendered to the individual patient.
  2. Summary judgment based on the Medical Malpractice Act's expert-testimony requirements was improper because the administrator's claims were not governed by the Act.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether negligence and sexual assault and battery claims based on a nursing home's alleged failure to ensure a resident's safety are subject to Virginia's Medical Malpractice Act.
  2. Whether the circuit court properly granted summary judgment because the administrator's witnesses were not qualified to provide expert medical testimony under the Medical Malpractice Act.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (12)

  • Wilby v. Gostel, 265 Va. 437, 578 S.E.2d 796 (2003)(followed)
  • Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. RBMW, Inc., 262 Va. 502, 551 S.E.2d 313 (2001)(followed)
  • Britt Constr., Inc. v. Magazzine Clean, LLC, 271 Va. 58, 623 S.E.2d 886 (2006)(followed)
  • West Lewinsville Heights Citizens Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors, 270 Va. 259, 618 S.E.2d 311 (2005)(followed)
  • Mozley v. Prestwould Bd. of Dirs., 264 Va. 549, 570 S.E.2d 817 (2002)(followed)
  • Williams v. Commonwealth, 265 Va. 268, 576 S.E.2d 468 (2003)(followed)
  • Woods v. Mendez, 265 Va. 68, 574 S.E.2d 263 (2003)(followed)
  • Industrial Dev. Auth. v. Board of Supervisors, 263 Va. 349, 559 S.E.2d 621 (2002)(followed)
  • Alliance to Save the Mattaponi v. Commonwealth, 270 Va. 423, 621 S.E.2d 78 (2005)(followed)
  • Hagan v. Antonio, 240 Va. 347, 397 S.E.2d 810 (1990)(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…