Hall v. Commonwealth

701 S.E.2d 68 (Va. 2010) · Supreme Court of Virginia · November 4, 2010 · No. Record No. 100160

Summary

The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed Antoine Lanier Hall's conviction for felonious escape under Code § 18.2-478. The Court held that Hall was in police custody when an officer informed him he was under arrest and physically grabbed his wrist to handcuff him, notwithstanding Hall's subsequent flight. The evidence therefore supported the finding that Hall escaped from custody by force or violence.

Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
Writing for the Court
Cynthia D. Kinser; Hassell, C.J.; Koontz, J.; Kinser, J.; Lemons, J.; Goodwyn, J.; Millette, J.; Lacy, S.J.
Jurisdiction
Virginia
Decision date
November 4, 2010
Docket number
Record No. 100160
Procedural posture
Hall appealed his conviction for felonious escape to the Court of Appeals of Virginia, which affirmed. The Supreme Court of Virginia granted his appeal and reviewed the sufficiency of the evidence showing that he was in police custody before escaping.
Standard of review
The trial court's factual findings are binding unless plainly wrong or unsupported by the evidence; whether the established facts constitute custody under Code § 18.2-478 is reviewed de novo.
Precedential value
Published opinion of the Supreme Court of Virginia; precedential.
Parties
Antoine Lanier Hall v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal procedurestatutory interpretationappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureappellate reviewstatutory interpretation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that Hall was in the custody of a police officer within the meaning of Code § 18.2-478 before he escaped.
  2. Whether an arrest is effected when an officer with lawful authority communicates the arrest and actually restrains or touches the individual for the purpose of arrest, even if the individual subsequently breaks free and flees.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Hall was in the custody of Officer Norris before he forcibly wrestled free and fled.
  2. The evidence supported the conclusion that Hall escaped from police custody by force or violence in violation of Code § 18.2-478; the judgment was affirmed.

Key quotations

Thus, at that moment, notwithstanding Hall's subsequent flight, the arrest was effected and Hall was in custody. (at 71)
Accordingly, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to prove that Hall was in "custody" pursuant to Code § 18.2-478 prior to his forcibly wrestling free of Officer Norris' grasp, and that Hall "escape[d]" from custody "by force or violence" in violation of Code § 18.2-478. (at 71)

Factual background

Two Danville police officers went to Hall's residence to serve outstanding arrest warrants. Officer Norris told Hall that he was under arrest, grabbed Hall's wrist, and began attempting to handcuff him while directing him to place his hands behind his back. Hall struggled, pulled away, wrestled free, and fled after Norris's grip on Hall's shirt was lost; he was later apprehended.

Procedural history

After a bench trial in the Circuit Court for the City of Danville, Hall was convicted under Code § 18.2-478 and sentenced to three years of incarceration, with two years and 290 days suspended, plus twelve months of supervised probation. The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed, concluding that Hall was arrested and therefore in custody when an officer grabbed his wrist and told him he was under arrest. The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the Court of Appeals.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…