Summary
The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed Ellen Marie Rix’s convictions for driving under the influence and refusing a blood or breath test. The court held that Rix was an “operator” of a motor vehicle under Virginia Code § 46.2-100 because she took actual physical control of a fully operational vehicle on a highway while the engine was running, even though the officer did not see her drive the vehicle.
Holdings
- A person is an operator of a motor vehicle when the person takes actual physical control of a fully operational vehicle on a highway with the ignition key in the on position and the engine running, even if the person was not observed putting the vehicle in motion.
- The convictions for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and refusing to submit to a blood or breath test were properly affirmed.
Questions Presented
- Whether a person who takes the driver's seat of a fully operational vehicle on a highway, while the engine is running and the ignition is on, is an operator of the vehicle under Code § 46.2-100 even though the person was not observed placing the vehicle in motion.
- Whether the convictions for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and refusing a blood or breath test should be affirmed.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Nelson v. Commonwealth, 281 Va. 212, 707 S.E.2d 815 (2011)(followed)
- Stevenson v. City of Falls Church, 243 Va. 434, 416 S.E.2d 435 (1992)(applied)
- Rix v. Commonwealth, 56 Va. App. 749, 697 S.E.2d 33 (2010)(affirmed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…