Rix v. Commonwealth, 282 Va. 1

714 S.E.2d 561 (2011) · Supreme Court of Virginia · June 9, 2011 · No. Record No. 101737

Summary

The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed Ellen Marie Rix’s convictions for driving under the influence and refusing a blood or breath test. The court held that Rix was an “operator” of a motor vehicle under Virginia Code § 46.2-100 because she took actual physical control of a fully operational vehicle on a highway while the engine was running, even though the officer did not see her drive the vehicle.

Holdings

  1. A person is an operator of a motor vehicle when the person takes actual physical control of a fully operational vehicle on a highway with the ignition key in the on position and the engine running, even if the person was not observed putting the vehicle in motion.
  2. The convictions for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and refusing to submit to a blood or breath test were properly affirmed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a person who takes the driver's seat of a fully operational vehicle on a highway, while the engine is running and the ignition is on, is an operator of the vehicle under Code § 46.2-100 even though the person was not observed placing the vehicle in motion.
  2. Whether the convictions for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and refusing a blood or breath test should be affirmed.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (3)

  • Nelson v. Commonwealth, 281 Va. 212, 707 S.E.2d 815 (2011)(followed)
  • Stevenson v. City of Falls Church, 243 Va. 434, 416 S.E.2d 435 (1992)(applied)
  • Rix v. Commonwealth, 56 Va. App. 749, 697 S.E.2d 33 (2010)(affirmed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…