Robin M. Kocher v. Richard Eugene Campbell

712 S.E.2d 477 (Va. 2011) · Supreme Court of Virginia · June 9, 2011 · No. Record No. 100399

Summary

The Supreme Court of Virginia held that a personal-injury claim became part of the plaintiff's bankruptcy estate when he filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and remained there until the bankruptcy court exempted it. Because the plaintiff lacked standing when he filed each complaint, those actions were legal nullities and did not toll the statute of limitations. The court reversed the circuit court's judgment and dismissed the case.

Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
Writing for the Court
Senior Justice Charles S. Russell; Chief Justice Kinser; Justice Lemons; Justice Goodwyn; Justice Millette; Justice Mims; Senior Justice Russell; Senior Justice Lacy
Jurisdiction
Virginia
Decision date
June 9, 2011
Docket number
Record No. 100399
Procedural posture
Interlocutory appeal from the circuit court's denial of the defendant's motion for summary judgment in a personal-injury action. The Supreme Court of Virginia awarded the appeal, reversed the denial of summary judgment, and dismissed the action.
Standard of review
De novo review applies because the appeal presents pure questions of law.
Precedential value
published precedential opinion
Parties
Robin M. Kocher v. Richard Eugene Campbell
Disposition
reversed

Topics

bankruptcychapter 7standingstatute of limitationssummary judgment

Practice areas

BankruptcyCivil procedureTortsAppellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiff had standing to prosecute a personal-injury claim that became part of his bankruptcy estate when he filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
  2. Whether the later bankruptcy exemption restored standing retroactively to validate complaints filed while the claim remained in the bankruptcy estate.
  3. Whether the plaintiff's complaints and nonsuits tolled Virginia's statute of limitations.
  4. Whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Holdings

  1. A debtor's inchoate personal-injury claim existing before the filing of a Chapter 7 petition becomes property of the bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. § 541.
  2. Until the claim was abandoned or exempted in accordance with federal bankruptcy law, only the bankruptcy trustee had authority to assert it; the plaintiff lacked standing to prosecute his state-court complaints.
  3. The bankruptcy court's May 29, 2009 exemption order did not retroactively confer standing for complaints filed before the exemption.
  4. The claim was time-barred because Virginia's two-year personal-injury limitation period expired on April 6, 2006, and none of the plaintiff's legally null complaints or nonsuits tolled the period.

Key quotations

If the debtor fails to follow this procedure, the cause of action, having become a part of the bankruptcy estate by virtue of 11 U.S.C 541, remains so, and is enforceable solely by the trustee. (at 480)
Because all three complaints filed against the defendant were legal nullities filed by a party who lacked standing, they, and the several purported nonsuits, had no tolling effect. (at 481)

Factual background

The plaintiff was injured in an April 6, 2004 motor-vehicle collision. Before filing suit, he filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on October 1, 2005, but did not list the personal-injury claim as an asset or claim it as exempt. He later filed three complaints without initially serving the defendant; the bankruptcy court did not order the claim exempted until May 29, 2009. By that time, Virginia's two-year personal-injury limitation period had expired.

Procedural history

After filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition without listing his personal-injury claim, the plaintiff filed three state-court complaints arising from the collision. The defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that the plaintiff lacked standing and that the statute of limitations barred the claim. The circuit court denied the motion and certified the standing issue for interlocutory appeal under Code § 8.01-670.1. The Supreme Court of Virginia accepted the appeal and reversed, holding that the complaints were legal nullities and that the claim was time-barred.

Remand instructions

No remand was ordered; the action was dismissed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…