Summary
The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the circuit court’s dismissal of Michael Fernandez’s claim for relocation benefits under the Virginia Relocation Assistance Act. The Court held that the Act does not create an implied private cause of action and that Fernandez had failed to exhaust the administrative review process available under VDOT regulations.
Holdings
- No private cause of action for payment of relocation expenses can be implied under Code § 25.1-406 of the Virginia Relocation Assistance Act.
- Fernandez was required to pursue the administrative review process provided by VDOT regulations before seeking judicial review, and he failed to exhaust those remedies.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Virginia Relocation Assistance Act creates an implied private cause of action for relocation payments under Code § 25.1-406.
- Whether Fernandez could bypass the administrative review process and directly seek judicial relief for his relocation-benefits claim.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (12)
- Sweely Holdings, LLC v. SunTrust Bank, 296 Va. 367, 370-71 (2018)(followed)
- Coward v. Wellmont Health System, 295 Va. 351, 359 (2018)(followed)
- Cherrie v. Virginia Health Services, Inc., 292 Va. 309, 314-15 (2016)(followed)
- Small v. Federal National Mortgage Association, 286 Va. 119, 126 (2013)(followed)
- Lafferty v. School Board of Fairfax County, 293 Va. 354, 362 (2017)(followed)
- Werth v. Fire Companies' Adjustment Bureau, 160 Va. 845, 856-57 (1933)(followed)
- Norfolk Motor Exchange v. Grubb, 152 Va. 471, 477 (1929)(followed)
- Osher v. City of St. Louis, 903 F.3d 698, 702-03 (8th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Delancey v. City of Austin, 570 F.3d 590, 594-95 (5th Cir. 2009)(persuasive)
- Clear Sky Car Wash LLC v. City of Chesapeake, 910 F. Supp. 2d 861, 875 (E.D. Va. 2012), aff'd on other grounds, 734 F.3d 438 (4th Cir. 2014)(persuasive)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…