Summary
The Washington Supreme Court considered whether RCW 4.24.550, concerning dissemination of registered sex offender information, constituted an “other statute” exemption under the Public Records Act. The court held that the statute did not expressly prohibit or exempt the blanket release of level I sex offender registration information in response to a public records request and reversed the trial court’s injunction. The court also held that the requester was not entitled to attorney fees, costs, or penalties.
Holdings
- RCW 4.24.550, including RCW 4.24.550(3)(a), is not an "other statute" under RCW 42.56.070(1) because it does not expressly prohibit or exempt the requested level I sex-offender registration records from disclosure. The records therefore are subject to disclosure under a Public Records Act request.
- Zink was not entitled to attorney fees, costs, or per diem penalties under the Public Records Act because she prevailed against private parties seeking to prevent disclosure, not against an agency.
Questions Presented
- Whether RCW 4.24.550, particularly RCW 4.24.550(3)(a), is an "other statute" under RCW 42.56.070(1) that exempts level I sex-offender registration information from disclosure under a Public Records Act request.
- Whether Zink was entitled to attorney fees, costs, or statutory penalties after prevailing on the disclosure issue against private parties rather than against an agency.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (23)
- Spokane Police Guild v. Wash. State Liquor Control Bd., 112 Wn. 2d 30, 769 P.2d 283 (1989)(followed)
- Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Office of Att'y Gen., 177 Wn. 2d 467, 300 P.3d 799 (2013)(followed)
- Dragonslayer, Inc. v. Wash. State Gambling Comm'n, 139 Wn. App. 433, 161 P.3d 428 (2007)(followed)
- Progressive Animal Welfare Soc'y v. Univ. of Wash., 125 Wn. 2d 243, 884 P.2d 592 (1994)(followed)
- Henne v. City of Yakima, 182 Wn. 2d 447, 341 P.3d 284 (2015)(followed)
- Dawson v. Daly, 120 Wn. 2d 782, 845 P.2d 995 (1993)(followed)
- Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe, 90 Wn. 2d 123, 580 P.2d 246 (1978)(followed)
- City of Lakewood v. Koenig, 182 Wn. 2d 87, 343 P.3d 335 (2014)(followed)
- Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Office of Att'y Gen., 170 Wn. 2d 418, 241 P.3d 1245 (2010)(followed)
- Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn. 2d 439, 90 P.3d 26 (2004)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…