James W. Kiser v. Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC

Kiser v. Pinnacle Mining · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · November 18, 2013 · No. No. 12-0261

Summary

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a Board of Review decision upholding an 8% permanent partial disability award for James W. Kiser’s left shoulder injury. The court concluded that the medical evaluations supporting the 8% award were more persuasive than the evaluation supporting a higher impairment rating and found no clear legal or factual error.

Court
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Writing for the Court
Per curiam; Chief Justice Brent D. Benjamin; Justice Robin J. Davis; Justice Margaret L. Workman; Justice Menis E. Ketchum; Justice Allen H. Loughry II
Jurisdiction
West Virginia
Decision date
November 18, 2013
Docket number
No. 12-0261
Procedural posture
Petition for appellate review of a West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review final order affirming an Office of Judges order that upheld an 8% permanent partial disability award for Kiser’s left shoulder injury.
Standard of review
The court examined whether the Board of Review’s decision violated a constitutional or statutory provision, resulted from erroneous conclusions of law, or was based on a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record.
Precedential value
Unpublished memorandum decision
Parties
James W. Kiser v. Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

workers compensationadministrative lawappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

Workers compensationAdministrative lawAppellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Kiser established that he was entitled to a permanent partial disability award greater than 8% for his compensable left shoulder injury.
  2. Whether the Office of Judges improperly discounted Dr. Poletajev’s impairment report and whether the Board of Review’s affirmance was supported by the evidentiary record.

Holdings

  1. Kiser failed to prove that he was entitled to an award greater than the 8% permanent partial disability award previously granted for his left shoulder injury.
  2. The Board of Review’s decision was not in clear violation of a constitutional or statutory provision, was not clearly the result of erroneous conclusions of law, and was not based on a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record.

Key quotations

The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. (at 1)
For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record. (at 2)

Factual background

Kiser, a mechanic for Pinnacle Mining Company, was injured on January 18, 2007, when a large chunk of ice struck him while he was working in a mine elevator shaft. His workers’ compensation claim was held compensable for multiple chest, shoulder, scapular, rotator-cuff, and related conditions. Medical evaluators disagreed about the degree of impairment, but the Office of Judges and Board of Review found the 8% impairment opinions of Drs. Guberman and Landis more persuasive than Dr. Poletajev’s 30% opinion.

Procedural history

The claims administrator awarded Kiser 8% permanent partial disability for his left shoulder. The Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges affirmed that decision on July 28, 2011, and the Board of Review affirmed on January 31, 2012. Kiser appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, which affirmed the Board’s final order in a memorandum decision.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…