Holt v. West Virginia-American Water Co., 233 W. Va. 688

760 S.E.2d 895 (2014) · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · June 11, 2014

Summary

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed dismissal of Roger F. Holt’s West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act claims against West Virginia-American Water Company. The court held that the claims arose from transactions under a public utility tariff and were therefore excluded from the Act by West Virginia Code § 46A-1-105(a)(3).

Holdings

  1. Section 46A-1-105(a)(3) is unambiguous and excludes more than challenges to publicly approved rates and charges; the phrase 'transactions under public utility or common carrier tariffs' encompasses the rules, regulations, and practices governing rate- and charge-based utility services.
  2. Holt's WVCCPA claims all arose from transactions described in West Virginia-American Water Company's public utility tariff and were therefore excluded from the WVCCPA by section 46A-1-105(a)(3).
  3. The circuit court properly dismissed Holt's complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), and the dismissal order was affirmed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether West Virginia Code section 46A-1-105(a)(3) is ambiguous regarding the exclusion of transactions under public utility tariffs from the WVCCPA.
  2. Whether Holt's claims concerning West Virginia-American Water Company's leak-adjustment, billing, late-penalty, and service-termination practices arose from transactions under a public utility tariff and were therefore excluded from the WVCCPA.
  3. Whether the circuit court properly dismissed the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6).

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (11)

  • State ex rel. McGraw v. Scott Runyan Pontiac-Buick, Inc., 194 W. Va. 770, 461 S.E.2d 516 (1995)(followed)
  • Hill v. Stowers, 224 W. Va. 51, 680 S.E.2d 66 (2009)(followed)
  • State v. Epperly, 135 W. Va. 877, 65 S.E.2d 488 (1951)(followed)
  • State v. Jarvis, 199 W. Va. 635, 487 S.E.2d 293 (1997)(followed)
  • Mace v. Mylan Pharm., Inc., 227 W. Va. 666, 714 S.E.2d 223 (2011)(followed)
  • Crockett v. Andrews, 153 W. Va. 714, 172 S.E.2d 384 (1970)(followed)
  • Hereford v. Meek, 132 W. Va. 373, 52 S.E.2d 740 (1949)(followed)
  • In re Waikoloa Sanitary Sewer Co., Inc., 109 Hawai'i 263, 125 P.3d 484 (2005)(persuasive)
  • Adams v. N. Ill. Gas Co., 211 Ill. 2d 32, 809 N.E.2d 1248 (2004)(persuasive)
  • Danisco Ingredients USA, Inc. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co., 267 Kan. 760, 986 P.2d 377 (1999)(persuasive)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…