Leonard Dempsey v. Parsley Enterprises, Inc.

Dempsey v. Parsley Enterprises · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · October 20, 2014 · No. No. 13-0656

Summary

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the Board of Review’s denial of temporary total disability benefits to Leonard Dempsey. The court held that the record contained no medical evidence establishing temporary total disability from May 25, 2012, through July 12, 2012, and found no clear legal or factual error in the Board’s decision.

Court
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Chief Justice Robin J. Davis; Justice Margaret L. Workman; Justice Allen H. Loughry II; Justice Brent D. Benjamin; Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Jurisdiction
West Virginia
Decision date
October 20, 2014
Docket number
No. 13-0656
Procedural posture
Leonard Dempsey appealed the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’s final order reversing the Office of Judges and reinstating the claims administrator’s decision closing his claim for temporary total disability benefits.
Standard of review
The Board of Review’s decision is affirmed unless it clearly violates a constitutional or statutory provision, clearly results from erroneous conclusions of law, or is based on a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record.
Precedential value
Memorandum decision; no reporter citation appears in the source.
Parties
Leonard Dempsey v. Parsley Enterprises, Inc.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

workers compensationadministrative lawstandard of reviewappellate procedure

Practice areas

workers compensationadministrative lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Board of Review erred in reinstating the claims administrator’s closure of Dempsey’s temporary total disability benefits claim.
  2. Whether the evidentiary record supported an award of temporary total disability benefits from May 25, 2012, through July 12, 2012.

Holdings

  1. The Board of Review did not clearly violate a constitutional or statutory provision, apply erroneous conclusions of law, or materially misstate or mischaracterize the evidentiary record; therefore, its decision was properly affirmed.
  2. Dempsey was not entitled to temporary total disability benefits for that period because the record lacked medical evidence establishing temporary total disability.

Key quotations

There is no evidence in the record to indicate that Mr. Dempsey was temporarily and totally disabled during the requested time period. (at 2)
There are no medical reports during the time period and no physician of record opined that he was temporarily and totally disabled from May 25, 2012, through July 12, 2012. (at 2)

Factual background

Dempsey, a coal miner, injured his right hand at work on December 29, 2010, when it was caught in a door handle, requiring wrist surgery. On May 10, 2012, physicians found excellent healing and released him to full active duty without restrictions. Although Dempsey was later taken off work and treated on July 12, 2012, the medical evidence showed a well-healed fracture, no mass or fluid, and no physician opinion that he was temporarily and totally disabled during the requested period.

Procedural history

The claims administrator closed Dempsey’s claim for temporary total disability benefits on July 3, 2012. The Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges reversed that decision and awarded benefits from May 25, 2012, through July 12, 2012. The Board of Review reversed the Office of Judges and reinstated the claims administrator’s decision. The Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the Board of Review.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…