Louise Frank, Widow of Clarence S. Frank v. Alcan Rolled Products–Ravenswood, LLC

Frank v. Alcan Rolled Products–Ravenswood · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · April 14, 2014 · No. No. 12-1247

Summary

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of dependent’s workers’ compensation benefits to Louise Frank following her husband’s death from metastatic renal cancer. The court held that occupational pneumoconiosis was not shown to have contributed materially to his death and that the supporting medical opinions were too speculative.

Court
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Writing for the Court
Chief Justice Robin J. Davis; Justice Brent D. Benjamin; Justice Margaret L. Workman; Justice Menis E. Ketchum; Justice Allen H. Loughry II
Jurisdiction
West Virginia
Decision date
April 14, 2014
Docket number
No. 12-1247
Procedural posture
Louise Frank appealed the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’s affirmance of an order denying her application for dependent’s benefits arising from her husband’s death.
Standard of review
The court reviewed whether the Board of Review’s decision was in clear violation of a constitutional or statutory provision, clearly the result of erroneous conclusions of law, or based on a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record. The court also considered whether the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s findings were clearly wrong.
Precedential value
Unpublished memorandum decision
Parties
Louise Frank, widow of Clarence S. Frank v. Alcan Rolled Products–Ravenswood, LLC
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

workers compensationjudicial review of agency actionadministrative lawappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

workers compensationadministrative lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s finding that occupational pneumoconiosis did not contribute in any material degree to Clarence Frank’s death was clearly wrong.
  2. Whether Louise Frank established entitlement to dependent’s workers’ compensation benefits based on her husband’s death.

Holdings

  1. The Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s finding that occupational pneumoconiosis did not contribute in any material degree to Clarence Frank’s death was not clearly wrong.
  2. Louise Frank was not entitled to dependent’s benefits because she did not demonstrate that occupational pneumoconiosis contributed in any material degree to her husband’s death.

Key quotations

The opinions of Dr. Cawley and Dr. Rasmussen are too speculative in nature to support Mrs. Frank’s application for dependent’s benefits. (at 2)
For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record. (at 2-3)

Factual background

Clarence S. Frank, an aluminum plant worker for Alcan Rolled Products, died on August 9, 2007, from metastatic renal cancer. Medical opinions differed regarding whether his exposure to asbestos or aluminum dust increased his risk of renal cancer or otherwise contributed to his death. The Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board found no occupational pneumoconiosis or asbestosis and concluded that occupational pneumoconiosis did not contribute in any material degree to his death.

Procedural history

The claims administrator denied Frank’s application for dependent’s benefits on April 15, 2009, based on the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s conclusion that occupational pneumoconiosis did not contribute materially to Clarence Frank’s death. The Office of Judges affirmed the denial on March 13, 2012, and the Board of Review affirmed on September 20, 2012. The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the Board of Review.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…