Summary
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the denial of Patrick L. Linzy’s workers’ compensation claim arising from a motor vehicle accident during his lunch break. The Court held that, although Linzy was driving a company vehicle and was subject to being called back to work, he was not performing a work-related activity and was not acting within the scope of his employment when the accident occurred. Justice Brent D. Benjamin dissented.
Holdings
- Linzy's injury was not compensable because, when the accident occurred, he was not acting within the scope of his employment or performing a work-related activity.
- The Board of Review's decision did not clearly violate a constitutional or statutory provision, result from an erroneous conclusion of law, or rely on a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record.
Questions Presented
- Whether Linzy's injuries from a motor vehicle accident while returning to work from lunch occurred within the scope of his employment and were compensable under workers’ compensation law.
- Whether the Board of Review's decision rejecting the claim clearly violated a constitutional or statutory provision, resulted from an erroneous conclusion of law, or rested on a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (1)
- Williby v. WVOIC, 224 W.Va. 358, 686 S.E.2d 9 (2009)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…