Summary
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed Jennifer Marie Wallace’s seven-year sentence for second-degree arson. The court held that the sentence was within the statutory range, was not based on an impermissible factor, and was not constitutionally disproportionate. The court declined to address the alternative-sentencing claim because it was inadequately briefed.
Holdings
- The seven-year sentence was not constitutionally disproportionate. It fell within the statutory range of one to ten years, was not based on an impermissible factor, and was within the circuit court's sentencing discretion.
- The court declined to address the alternative-sentencing claim on the merits because Wallace's brief did not cite legal authority supporting the claim and therefore inadequately preserved it.
Questions Presented
- Whether Wallace's seven-year sentence for second-degree arson was constitutionally disproportionate to the crime and therefore violated the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
- Whether the circuit court erred by denying Wallace's request for alternative sentencing.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- State v. Lucas, 201 W. Va. 271, 496 S.E.2d 221 (1997)(followed)
- State v. Eilola, 226 W. Va. 698, 704 S.E.2d 698 (2010)(followed)
- State v. Goodnight, 169 W. Va. 366, 287 S.E.2d 504 (1982)(followed)
- Wanstreet v. Bordenkircher, 166 W. Va. 523, 276 S.E.2d 205 (1981)(followed)
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 486 (1966)(cited)
- State, Dep't of Health v. Robert Morris N., 195 W. Va. 759, 466 S.E.2d 827 (1995)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…