Larry J. Shepherd v. Cornerstone Interiors, Inc.

No. 21-0407 (BOR Appeal No. 2055863) (Claim No. 2017007575) · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · September 19, 2022 · No. No. 21-0407 (BOR Appeal No. 2055863) (Claim No. 2017007575)

Summary

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a decision awarding Larry J. Shepherd 9% permanent partial disability benefits for compensable cervical and lumbar sprains. The court concluded that the evidence supported apportionment for preexisting degenerative conditions and that Shepherd had not shown entitlement to a greater award.

Court
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Chief Justice John A. Hutchison; Justice Elizabeth D. Walker; Justice Tim Armstead; Justice William R. Wooton; Justice C. Haley Bunn
Jurisdiction
West Virginia
Decision date
September 19, 2022
Docket number
No. 21-0407 (BOR Appeal No. 2055863) (Claim No. 2017007575)
Procedural posture
Claimant appealed the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review's affirmance of a 9% permanent partial disability award.
Standard of review
Under W. Va. Code § 23-5-15, the Court gives deference to the Board of Review's findings, reasoning, and conclusions. When the Board affirms prior rulings by the commission and Office of Judges on the same issue, reversal or modification is permitted only for a clear constitutional or statutory violation, erroneous conclusions of law, or material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record; the Court may not conduct a de novo reweighing of the evidence. Questions of law are reviewed de novo.
Precedential value
Published memorandum decision with limited precedential value under West Virginia appellate practice
Parties
Larry J. Shepherd v. Cornerstone Interiors, Inc.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

workers compensationappellate procedurestandard of reviewadministrative law

Practice areas

workers compensationadministrative lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Shepherd established entitlement to a permanent partial disability award greater than 9% for his compensable lumbar and cervical sprains.
  2. Whether the Board of Review's affirmance of the 9% award was clearly erroneous under the review standard applicable to workers’ compensation appeals.

Holdings

  1. Shepherd failed to prove entitlement to a permanent partial disability award greater than 9%; the evidence supported the 9% award based on the compensable injuries after accounting for preexisting impairment.
  2. The Court may not reverse or modify the Board's decision affirming prior rulings on the same issue absent a clear constitutional or statutory violation, an erroneous conclusion of law, or a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the evidentiary record, and it may not reweigh the evidence de novo.

Key quotations

The court may not conduct a de novo reweighing of the evidentiary record . . . . (at 1)
Pre-existing impairments and an aggravation thereof shall not be taken into consideration in determining the amount of permanent partial disability an employee is entitled to. (at 4)

Factual background

Shepherd, a drywall finisher, injured his lower back and neck in an August 10, 2016, fall, and the claim was held compensable for lumbar and cervical sprains. Medical records and imaging showed that he had preexisting degenerative disease, chronic lumbar pain, radiculopathy, and related treatment before the compensable injury. The physicians who evaluated Shepherd assessed impairment ratings ranging from 8% to 15%, but the Office of Judges relied on Dr. Bachwitt's 9% assessment because Dr. Guberman's higher assessment did not apportion for symptomatic preexisting impairment. The Board of Review affirmed the 9% award.

Procedural history

The claims administrator granted Shepherd a 9% permanent partial disability award. The Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges affirmed that decision on October 5, 2020, and the Board of Review affirmed on April 22, 2021. The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia reviewed the Board's decision and affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…