Summary
The Wisconsin Supreme Court reviewed whether Menasha Corporation's SAP R/3 System qualified as custom computer software exempt from Wisconsin sales and use tax. The court held that the Tax Appeals Commission's interpretation of the applicable statute and administrative rule was entitled to deference and affirmed the conclusion that the software was custom and therefore tax-exempt.
Holdings
- The Commission's interpretation of the statute is entitled to due-weight deference.
- The Commission's interpretation of the administrative rule is entitled to controlling-weight deference, and the Commission was not required to defer to the Department of Revenue's interpretation of the rule.
- The R/3 System was a custom computer program and therefore was exempt from Wisconsin sales and use tax.
Questions Presented
- What level of deference should the Wisconsin Supreme Court give to the Tax Appeals Commission's interpretations of Wis. Stat. § 77.51(20) and Wis. Admin. Code § Tax 11.71(1)(e)?
- Was the Tax Appeals Commission required to defer to the Department of Revenue's interpretation of Wis. Admin. Code § Tax 11.71(1)(e)?
- Did the Commission reasonably conclude that SAP's R/3 System was a custom computer program exempt from Wisconsin sales and use tax?
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (13)
- DaimlerChrysler v. LIRC, 2007 WI 15, 299 Wis. 2d 1, 727 N.W.2d 311(followed)
- Orion Flight Services, Inc. v. Basler Flight Service, 2006 WI 51, 290 Wis. 2d 421, 714 N.W.2d 130(followed)
- Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Wisconsin Division of Hearings & Appeals, 2006 WI 86, 292 Wis. 2d 549, 717 N.W.2d 184(followed)
- DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, 299 Wis. 2d 561, 729 N.W.2d 396(distinguished)
- DOR v. Caterpillar, Inc., 2001 WI App 35, 241 Wis. 2d 282, 625 N.W.2d 338(followed)
- Kamps v. DOR, 2003 WI App 106, 264 Wis. 2d 794, 663 N.W.2d 306(followed)
- DOR v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co., 208 Wis. 2d 582, 561 N.W.2d 344 (Ct. App. 1997)(followed)
- DOR v. U.S. Shoe Corp., 158 Wis. 2d 123, 462 N.W.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1990)(followed)
- State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110(followed)
- All City Communication Co., Inc. v. DOR, 2003 WI App 77, 263 Wis. 2d 394, 661 N.W.2d 845(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…