Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alan D. Eisenberg

322 Wis. 2d 518 (Wis. 2010) · Supreme Court of Wisconsin · February 18, 2010 · No. No. 2007AP1083-D

Summary

The Wisconsin Supreme Court reviewed disciplinary proceedings against attorney Alan D. Eisenberg. The court upheld the referee's finding that Eisenberg engaged in misconduct by filing and pursuing a civil action for harassment or malicious injury, revoked his Wisconsin law license, and assessed the proceeding's costs against him. The court also considered Eisenberg's extensive prior disciplinary history.

Holdings

  1. The referee's findings of fact were supported by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence and were not clearly erroneous; the court adopted them.
  2. Eisenberg violated SCR 20:3.1(a)(3) by filing and pursuing the civil suit when he knew or it was obvious that the action would serve merely to harass or maliciously injure M.D.
  3. Eisenberg could not collaterally attack in the disciplinary proceeding the prior determination that sanctions were properly imposed for initiating and maintaining the civil action to harass M.D.
  4. Revocation of Eisenberg's Wisconsin law license was necessary because the aggravated misconduct and extensive disciplinary history required a sanction sufficient to protect the public, deter misconduct, and impress upon him the seriousness of his conduct.
  5. Count Two, alleging that Eisenberg knowingly advanced an unwarranted claim or defense under SCR 20:3.1(a)(1), was not proved and was dismissed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence established that Eisenberg violated SCR 20:3.1(a)(3) by filing and pursuing a civil action when he knew or it was obvious that the action would merely harass or maliciously injure M.D.
  2. Whether the referee's findings of fact were clearly erroneous.
  3. Whether revocation of Eisenberg's law license was the appropriate sanction in light of the misconduct and his extensive prior disciplinary history.
  4. Whether Count Two, alleging a violation of SCR 20:3.1(a)(1), was proved.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (10)

  • State v. Eisenberg, 48 Wis. 2d 364, 180 N.W.2d 529 (1970)(applied)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 144 Wis. 2d 284, 423 N.W.2d 867 (1988)(cited)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747(applied)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2007 WI 7, 298 Wis. 2d 578, 726 N.W.2d 634(cited)
  • Eisenberg v. Deutsch, 289 Wis. 2d 218, 709 N.W.2d 111 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005)(cited)
  • Jandrt v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 227 Wis. 2d 531, 597 N.W.2d 744 (1999)(cited)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Lauer, 108 Wis. 2d 746, 324 N.W.2d 432 (1982)(applied)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Widule, 2003 WI 34, 261 Wis. 2d 45, 660 N.W.2d 686(cited)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Caldwell, 171 Wis. 2d 393, 491 N.W.2d 482 (1992)(distinguished)
  • In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Converse, 2006 WI 4, 287 Wis. 2d 72, 707 N.W.2d 530(applied)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…