Summary
The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed a decision concerning the termination of S.E.'s parental rights to T.L.E.-C. The court held that the statutory 15-of-22-month timeframe for the continuing CHIPS ground began when S.E. received written notice with the initial 2016 CHIPS order, despite a later statutory amendment. The court also held that applying the timeframe beginning in 2016 did not violate S.E.'s due process rights.
Holdings
- The 15-of-22-month timeframe under the 2018 version of Wisconsin Statutes section 48.415(2)(a)3 began when S. E. received written termination warnings accompanying the initial 2016 CHIPS order.
- Applying the 2018 version of section 48.415(2)(a)3 to S. E.'s proceeding was not an impermissible retroactive application.
- Beginning the 15-of-22-month timeframe in 2016 and applying the amended continuing-CHIPS statute did not violate S. E.'s due process rights.
Questions Presented
- Whether the 15-of-22-month timeframe in the 2018 version of Wisconsin Statutes section 48.415(2)(a)3 began when S. E. received written notice accompanying the initial 2016 CHIPS order or only after she received notice of the amended statute.
- Whether applying the 2018 version of section 48.415(2)(a)3 to begin the 15-of-22-month timeframe in 2016 constituted impermissible retroactive legislation.
- Whether applying the amended statute without earlier notice violated S. E.'s due process rights.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- State v. Stephenson, 2020 WI 92, 394 Wis. 2d 703, 951 N.W.2d 819(followed)
- State v. Smith, 2010 WI 16, 323 Wis. 2d 377, 780 N.W.2d 90(followed)
- Dane Cnty. DHS v. J.R., 2020 WI App 5, 390 Wis. 2d 326, 938 N.W.2d 614(followed)
- St. Croix Cnty. DHS v. Michael D., 2016 WI 35, 368 Wis. 2d 170, 880 N.W.2d 107(followed)
- Dane Cnty. v. Kelly M., 2011 WI App 69, 333 Wis. 2d 719, 798 N.W.2d 697(followed)
- Waukesha Cnty. v. Steven H., 2000 WI 28, 233 Wis. 2d 344, 607 N.W.2d 607(followed)
- Tammy W-G v. Jacob T., 2011 WI 30, 333 Wis. 2d 273, 797 N.W.2d 854(followed)
- State ex rel. Kalal v. Cir. Ct. for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110(followed)
- State v. Hemp, 2014 WI 129, 359 Wis. 2d 320, 856 N.W.2d 811(followed)
- Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis. 2d 574, 456 N.W.2d 312 (1990)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…