Danell Blevins v. State

2017 WY 43 (Wyo. 2017) · Supreme Court of Wyoming · April 27, 2017 · No. S-16-0191

Summary

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed Danell Blevins’s conviction for felony exploitation of a vulnerable adult. The court held that sufficient evidence supported the jury’s finding that the victim was a vulnerable adult and concluded that, although the exploitation instruction improperly included both reckless and intentional conduct, the error did not prejudice Blevins because the elements instruction required intentional conduct.

Court
Supreme Court of Wyoming
Writing for the Court
Kautz, Justice; Burke, C.J.; Hill, J.; Davis, J.; Fox, J.; Kautz, J.
Jurisdiction
Wyoming
Decision date
April 27, 2017
Docket number
S-16-0191
Procedural posture
Blevins appealed her jury conviction for felony exploitation of a vulnerable adult, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the jury instruction concerning the required mental state.
Standard of review
For sufficiency of the evidence, the Court considers whether the evidence could reasonably support the factfinder's conclusion, views the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, accepts favorable inferences, and does not reweigh evidence or reassess witness credibility. Because Blevins did not object to the jury instruction, the instructional challenge was reviewed for plain error. Statutory interpretation was reviewed de novo as a question of law.
Precedential value
Published Wyoming Supreme Court opinion; precedential unless otherwise limited by subsequent authority.
Parties
Danell Blevins v. State of Wyoming
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal procedureevidencestatutory interpretationjury instructionsstandard of review

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureelder abuse and vulnerable-adult exploitationevidencestatutory interpretation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether sufficient evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt that Tefertiller was a vulnerable adult under Wyoming law.
  2. Whether the jury instruction defining exploitation improperly included both reckless and intentional mental states when Blevins was charged with felony intentional exploitation.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was sufficient for the jury to find that Tefertiller was a vulnerable adult because, as a result of advanced age and physical and mental impairments, he was unable to manage and care for himself and his assets without assistance.
  2. The definition-of-exploitation instruction was confusing and should have included only the intentional mental element applicable to the charged felony, but the error did not constitute reversible plain error because the elements instruction correctly required intentional conduct and the evidence showed that Blevins acted intentionally.

Key quotations

The plain language of § 6-2-507 does not require a nexus between the victim’s particular impairment and the exploitation. (¶ 22)
We agree with Ms. Blevins that the district court’s definition of exploitation in Instruction No. 18 was confusing because it included the mental elements for both the felony and misdemeanor crimes. (¶ 29)
The jury was clearly and properly instructed in Instruction No. 17 that it had to find that Ms. Blevins acted intentionally in order to find her guilty. (¶ 31)

Factual background

Danell Blevins, a licensed practical nurse at a Veterans Affairs clinic, befriended Richard Tefertiller, an approximately seventy-three-year-old disabled veteran with PTSD, alcohol-related problems, memory issues, and physical impairments. Between January 2014 and January 2015, Tefertiller gave Blevins approximately $39,550, at least $39,000 of which was intended as a loan for her nursing education. Blevins did not enter the nursing program and instead used most of the money for personal expenses. Evidence showed that Tefertiller required assistance with physical tasks, medications, bills, and financial management, and Blevins admitted that she knew he was vulnerable and experiencing mental problems.

Procedural history

A jury in the Uinta County District Court convicted Blevins of intentionally exploiting a vulnerable adult. The district court sentenced her to one to four years in prison and ordered $39,000 in restitution. The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…