Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal held that a successor judge may not enter a final judgment based on evidence heard by a predecessor judge when the predecessor had not rendered the judgment by signing, filing, or publicly announcing it. The court reversed and remanded for a new trial, ruling that a proposed written judgment that was never signed or filed is not a rendered judgment and cannot be entered by a successor.
Holdings
- A successor judge may not enter an order or judgment based upon evidence heard by the predecessor judge; until rendered, the decision of a trial judge is not a judgment. A proposed final judgment reduced to writing but not signed, recorded, filed, or publicly announced by the predecessor judge cannot be entered by a successor judge without hearing the evidence.
Questions Presented
- Whether a successor judge may enter a final judgment based on evidence heard by a predecessor judge when the predecessor judge had not rendered, signed, or filed the judgment before leaving the bench.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (11)
- Olympic Manufacturing Co. v. Shepherd, 190 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)(distinguished)
- Anders v. Anders, 376 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)(followed)
- Beattie v. Beattie, 536 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)(followed)
- Silvern v. Silvern, 252 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)(followed)
- Bradford v. Foundation & Marine Construction Co., 182 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
- Foundation & Marine Construction Co. v. Bradford, 188 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 1966)
- Wainwright v. P.H. & F.M. Roots Co., 176 Ind. 682, 97 N.E. 8 (1912)(cited_with_approval)
- State ex rel. Wilson v. Kay, 164 Wash. 685, 4 P.2d 498 (1931)(cited_with_approval)
- State v. Dowdell, 55 Md. App. 512, 464 A.2d 1089 (1983)(cited_with_approval)
- Dowdell v. State, 298 Md. 310, 469 A.2d 864 (1984)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…