United States v. Richardson

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 5, 2023 · No. 22-10697

Summary

The Fifth Circuit held that business entities qualify as "victims" under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA) for Hobbs Act robbery restitution, rejecting the argument that only natural persons are eligible. The court also modified the restitution award from $5,000 to $4,500, reducing the lost-income component from $4,000 to $3,500 because the record supported only $3,500 in average Monday sales, not the higher estimate. The case clarifies that corporate victims may receive restitution under the MVRA and that restitution amounts must be supported by adequate evidentiary basis, with the government bearing the initial burden of proof.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Stephen A. Higginson; Clement; Graves; Higginson
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
May 5, 2023
Docket number
22-10697
Procedural posture
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Standard of review
De novo for legality of MVRA award; abuse of discretion for amount of restitution.
Precedential value
Published
Parties
Devonsha Richardson v. United States of America
Disposition
other

Topics

criminal proceduresentencingstatutory interpretationappellate procedure

Practice areas

Criminal LawAppellate Practice

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a business entity qualifies as a 'victim' under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA)
  2. Whether the district court erred in ordering restitution in the amount of $5,000, specifically the $4,000 for lost income.

Holdings

  1. A business entity can be a victim under the MVRA because the statutory definition of 'person' includes corporations, and the MVRA's definition of 'victim' does not exclude them.
  2. The district court abused its discretion in ordering $4,000 for lost income; the proper amount is $3,500 based on the evidence of average Monday sales.

Key quotations

we have routinely found that restitution may be ordered to non-natural persons.
we modify the judgment to reduce the restitution ordered to be paid to Parks Food Mart to $3,500.
Nothing in Lagos suggests that its holding extends so far—indeed, Lagos itself cabined its discussion of the benefits of a 'narrow' rather than 'broad' reading to the specific provision at issue.

Factual background

Devonsha Richardson robbed Parks Food Mart, stealing approximately $600 in cash, seventy-five lottery tickets, and a Beretta handgun. The store was closed for about six hours for investigation. The district court ordered restitution of $5,000: $1,000 for stolen property and $4,000 for lost income.

Procedural history

Defendant pleaded guilty to Hobbs Act robbery. The district court sentenced him and ordered restitution of $5,000 to Parks Food Mart. Defendant appealed the restitution order.

Remand instructions

The judgment is modified to reduce restitution to $3,500 for lost income; otherwise affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…