Summary
The First Circuit dismissed an appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction, holding that a district court's denial of a motion to compel arbitration, treated as a reconsideration of a pre-removal state court order under 28 U.S.C. § 1450, is not a final appealable order absent newly available evidence or law. The court did not reach the merits of whether a nonsignatory debt collector could enforce an arbitration agreement under the Massachusetts standard set forth in *Landry v. Transworld Systems Inc.*, 149 N.E.3d 781 (Mass. 2020). The underlying putative class action alleged violations of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and debt collection regulations.
Holdings
- The order is not a final decision and does not fall within an exception for interlocutory review. Therefore, the court lacks appellate jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court's denial of a motion to compel arbitration, treated as a motion for reconsideration of a state court order, is a final appealable order.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (15)
- Landry v. Transworld Systems Inc., 149 N.E.3d 781 (Mass. 2020)(cited)
- Concordia Partners, LLC v. Pick, 790 F.3d 277 (1st Cir. 2015)(cited)
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters, 415 U.S. 423 (1974)(cited)
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortg. Corp., 402 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2005)(cited)
- Anderson v. City of New Orleans, 38 F.4th 472 (5th Cir. 2022)(cited)
- Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299 (1996)(cited)
- United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1990)(cited)
- Cozza v. Network Assocs., Inc., 362 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 2004)(cited)
- Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Santiago Plaza, 598 F.2d 634 (1st Cir. 1979)(cited)
- Fritsch v. Swift Transp. Co. of Ariz., LLC, 899 F.3d 785 (9th Cir. 2018)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.