Summary
The Fourth Circuit held that a valid appellate waiver does not bar a challenge to the factual basis of a guilty plea, because such a claim goes to the voluntariness of the plea. However, the court found the factual basis sufficient where the defendant stipulated to being a member of a crack-cocaine conspiracy, as a stipulated recitation of facts alone satisfies Rule 11. The defendant's waiver was knowing and voluntary, so his remaining sentencing challenges were dismissed.
Holdings
- Even valid appeal waivers do not bar claims that a factual basis is insufficient to support a guilty plea.
- A stipulated recitation of facts alone is sufficient to support a plea, and here the factual basis established the elements of the offense.
- Because McCoy validly waived his right to appeal the sentence, the court does not consider these issues.
Questions Presented
- Whether a challenge to the factual basis of a guilty plea falls outside the scope of a valid appellate waiver.
- Whether the district court erred in finding a sufficient factual basis to support McCoy's guilty plea.
- Whether the district court erred in its application of the Sentencing Guidelines.
Disposition
dismissed in part and affirmed
Cases Cited (22)
- United States v. Copeland, 707 F.3d 522 (4th Cir. 2013)(cited)
- United States v. Thornsbury, 670 F.3d 532 (4th Cir. 2012)(cited)
- United States v. Martinez, 277 F.3d 517 (4th Cir. 2002)(cited)
- United States v. Attar, 38 F.3d 727 (4th Cir. 1994)(cited)
- United States v. Marin, 961 F.2d 493 (4th Cir. 1992)(cited)
- United States v. Brown, 232 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2000)(cited)
- United States v. Contador-Cruz, 714 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2017)(cited)
- United States v. Baker, 571 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2014)(cited)
- United States v. Carter, 267 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2008)(distinguished)
- United States v. Molina, 286 F. App'x 94 (4th Cir. 2008)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…