Bean v. Sussex I State Prison, Warden

712 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 27, 2018 · No. 17-7316

Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from a district court's dismissal of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as untimely. The court denied a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis, concluding that the petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The appeal was dismissed without oral argument.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Traxler; Duncan; Hamilton
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
February 27, 2018
Docket number
17-7316
Procedural posture
Appeal from the district court's order dismissing a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely.
Standard of review
To obtain a certificate of appealability, a petitioner must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the petitioner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Precedential value
unpublished
Parties
Rhett Bean v. Sussex I State Prison, Warden
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

federal habeas corpusappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

Habeas CorpusPost-Conviction ReliefAppellate Procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Bean made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right to obtain a certificate of appealability.

Holdings

  1. Bean failed to make the requisite showing, so the court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

Factual background

Rhett Bean, a Virginia state prisoner, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. The district court dismissed the petition as untimely. Bean appealed, seeking a certificate of appealability.

Procedural history

The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissed Bean's § 2254 petition as untimely. Bean appealed, and the Fourth Circuit considered whether to grant a certificate of appealability.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…