Summary
This is an unpublished per curiam opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief on Michael Holloway's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against correction officers. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming for the reasons stated by the district court.
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Motz; Keenan; Hamilton
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
February 2, 2018
Docket number
17-7228
Procedural posture
Appeal from district court order denying relief on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.
Precedential value
unpublished
Parties
Michael Holloway v. Lieutenant Taylor; Officer Bradley
Disposition
affirmed
Topics
section 1983civil rightsappellate procedurecivil procedure
Practice areas
civil rightsappellate procedure
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court erred in denying relief on Holloway's §1983 complaint.
Holdings
- The district court's order is affirmed because there is no reversible error.
Key quotations
“We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.”
“Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.”
Factual background
Holloway, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against correction officers Taylor and Bradley. The district court denied relief. Holloway appealed.
Procedural history
Holloway filed a §1983 complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia. The district court denied relief. Holloway appealed.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…