New West v. Marcia L. Fudge

New West v. Fudge, No. 21-1372 (7th Cir. 2021) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · September 20, 2021 · No. 21-1372

Summary

The Seventh Circuit affirmed that reserve funds held in a HUD-assisted housing project belong to the project itself, not to the owner, after the project's completion and HUD's release of its lien. The court held that the owner could not treat the funds as its own property; instead, the funds must be used for tenant benefit or project purposes. The decision interprets the Regulatory Agreement and HUD's control over reserve accounts, emphasizing that the funds are project assets even after the use agreement expires. Key topics: HUD housing assistance, reserve fund ownership, project-based Section 8, contract interpretation, and federal jurisdiction under the Tucker Act.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
September 20, 2021
Docket number
21-1372
Procedural posture
Appeal from district court's grant of summary judgment for the Secretary.
Standard of review
de novo
Precedential value
Published
Parties
New West v. Marcia L. Fudge, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

summary judgmentcivil procedurecontractsreal estategovernment contracts

Practice areas

AppellateHousing LawGovernment Contracts

Questions Presented

  1. Whether New West established ownership of the reserve fund after the housing project was no longer subject to HUD's contract.

Holdings

  1. New West failed to establish ownership of the reserve fund because its self-serving characterization of the fund as taxable income does not prove ownership, and the contracts do not clearly assign ownership. Therefore, the district court's judgment granting summary judgment to the Secretary is affirmed.

Key quotations

It would be circular to permit New West to establish its ownership by reporting the income and then claiming the reporting shows ownership. (at 4)
The language in the contracts between the Secretary and the Department establishes that the reserve fund is the property of the owner, not the Secretary. (at 2)

Factual background

New West owned a housing project funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD provided a subsidy for low-income tenants, and part of the subsidy was deposited into a reserve fund for repairs and maintenance. After the project was no longer subject to HUD's contract, New West sought to recover the reserve fund. The Secretary claimed the fund belonged to the government. The district court granted summary judgment to the Secretary.

Procedural history

The district court granted the Secretary's motion for summary judgment, concluding that the reserve fund belonged to the government. New West appealed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…