David C. Lettieri v. Hostess Brands LLC

Lettieri · United States District Court for the District of Kansas · May 8, 2026 · No. 24-3064-JWL

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Kansas denied David C. Lettieri’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reopen a previously dismissed pro se civil action. The court held that the Tenth Circuit’s affirmance foreclosed reconsideration of the dismissal in the district court and explained that further challenges should be pursued through the appellate courts.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Kansas
Writing for the Court
John W. Lungstrum
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the District of Kansas
Decision date
May 8, 2026
Docket number
24-3064-JWL
Procedural posture
Plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the district court's denial of his motion to reopen a civil action that had previously been dismissed for failure to state a claim and affirmed on appeal.
Precedential value
unpublished
Disposition
other

Topics

motion for reconsiderationappellate procedurefinal judgment rulecivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedureappellate procedureprisoner civil rights

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court could reconsider the dismissal of the action after the Tenth Circuit had affirmed that dismissal.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reopen should be granted.

Holdings

  1. An appellate mandate forecloses the district court from reconsidering matters that were determined by the appellate court.
  2. The motion for reconsideration was denied because Plaintiff was attempting to relitigate the dismissal of his complaint after the Tenth Circuit had affirmed it.

Key quotations

The mandate of an appellate court forecloses the district court from reconsidering matters determined in the appellate court.
fails to state a claim. (at 5)

Factual background

Plaintiff brought a pro se civil action against Hostess Brands LLC and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state an actionable claim, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed that dismissal. Plaintiff continued to challenge the dismissal through a motion to reopen and then the present motion for reconsideration, asserting that the courts had erred by failing to recognize a cause of action under New York law.

Procedural history

The district court dismissed Plaintiff's pro se complaint for failure to state a claim on August 2, 2024. The Tenth Circuit affirmed the dismissal on May 15, 2025. Plaintiff then moved to reopen the case, the district court denied that motion, and Plaintiff filed the present motion for reconsideration, which the court denied.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…