Inquiry Concerning a Judge re Diaz

908 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 2005) · Supreme Court of Florida · July 7, 2005

Summary

The Florida Supreme Court reviewed and approved a stipulation for discipline involving Judge Robert F. Diaz, who admitted sending anonymous and potentially threatening or disparaging emails concerning another judge to that judge and a local Hispanic bar association. The Court accepted the recommended discipline of a public reprimand, fourteen-day suspension without pay, and $15,000 fine.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Writing for the Court
Wells; Anstead; Lewis; Quince; Bell; Cantero; Pariente
Jurisdiction
Florida
Decision date
July 7, 2005
Procedural posture
The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission filed formal charges against Judge Robert F. Diaz. Diaz entered into a factual stipulation admitting the charges and agreeing to the recommended discipline. The Supreme Court of Florida reviewed and approved the stipulation and discipline.
Standard of review
The Court reviews JQC findings for clear and convincing evidentiary support and reviews the recommended discipline to determine whether it should be approved. The Court gives the JQC's findings and recommendations great weight, but retains ultimate authority and responsibility over the determination.
Precedential value
Published Florida Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission v. Robert F. Diaz
Disposition
approved

Topics

appellate procedurestandard of reviewconstitutional lawdue process

Practice areas

judicial disciplinejudicial ethicsconstitutional lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the JQC's findings were supported by clear and convincing evidence.
  2. Whether the JQC's recommended discipline of a public reprimand, fourteen-day unpaid suspension, $15,000 fine, and public apologies was appropriate.

Holdings

  1. The JQC's findings were supported by clear and convincing evidence because Judge Diaz admitted the alleged wrongdoing and did not contest the commission's findings.
  2. The Court approved the stipulated discipline, including a public reprimand, fourteen-day suspension without pay, $15,000 fine, and public apologies.
  3. The Court accepted Diaz's concession that his conduct violated the broad provisions of Canons 1 and 2 of the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct, which prohibit conduct unbecoming a judicial officer, including threatening or disparaging remarks about other judges or parties in the circumstances presented.

Key quotations

This Court reviews the findings of the JQC to determine if they are supported by clear and convincing evidence and reviews the recommendation of discipline to determine whether it should be approved. (335)
While this Court gives the findings and recommendations of the JQC great weight, ‘the ultimate power and responsibility in making a determination rests with this Court.’ (335)
Accordingly, we approve the stipulation and direct that Judge Diaz pay the $15,000.00 fine and serve the fourteen-day suspension. This opinion shall serve as a public reprimand. (338)

Factual background

Judge Robert F. Diaz sent an anonymous email to County Judge Lee Seidman enclosing an article about a judge who had reported undocumented immigrants to federal authorities. The email referred to an alleged similar practice by Seidman and stated, "Isn't this what you used to do in Hollywood (Florida)? We remember." Diaz later sent a similar communication to the Broward County Hispanic Bar Association, which was viewed as an implied threat of organized group retaliation and an attempt to influence the association's relations with Seidman. Diaz admitted the conduct and agreed to the discipline recommended by the JQC.

Procedural history

The JQC charged Judge Diaz with sending anonymous and inappropriate emails concerning a fellow judge to that judge and to the Broward County Hispanic Bar Association. Diaz waived a trial, admitted the charges, and accepted a public reprimand, fourteen-day unpaid suspension, $15,000 fine, and public apologies. The JQC panel made findings and recommended that discipline, which the Supreme Court approved.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…