Summary
The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Deanthony Rashawn Hicks's convictions for malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The court held that the evidence was sufficient despite conflicting and recanted witness testimony, and that the trial court properly refused instructions on defense of others and voluntary manslaughter. The court also held that Hicks waived his challenge to the jury instruction concerning witness identification certainty and that plain error was not shown.
Holdings
- The evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find Hicks guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offenses for which he was convicted.
- The trial court properly refused to give a justification instruction because no evidence supported the theory that Hicks acted in defense of Vinson or reasonably feared imminent serious harm.
- The trial court properly refused to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter because the evidence did not show an intentional killing caused by sudden, violent, and irresistible passion resulting from serious provocation.
- Hicks waived appellate review of his challenge to the instruction concerning a witness's level of certainty because he failed to make a specific objection before the jury retired, and the plain-error exception did not apply.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain Hicks's convictions for malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.
- Whether the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on justification based on the use of force in defense of others.
- Whether the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter as a lesser included offense of malice murder.
- Whether the trial court's instruction that a witness's level of certainty may be considered in assessing identification reliability constituted reversible error despite Hicks's failure to make a specific objection.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (16)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)(followed)
- Major v. State, 280 Ga. 746, 747, 632 S.E.2d 661 (2006)(followed)
- Brower v. State, 298 Ga. App. 699, 702(1), 680 S.E.2d 859 (2009)(followed)
- Broussard v. State, 276 Ga. 216(2), 576 S.E.2d 883 (2003)(followed)
- Brown v. State, 267 Ga. 350(2), 478 S.E.2d 129 (1996)(followed)
- Lightning v. State, 297 Ga. App. 54(5), 676 S.E.2d 780 (2009)(followed)
- Davis v. State, 269 Ga. 276(3), 496 S.E.2d 699 (1998)(followed)
- Alexis v. State, 273 Ga. 423(4), 541 S.E.2d 636 (2001)(followed)
- Williams v. State, 209 Ga. App. 355(1), 433 S.E.2d 361 (1993)(distinguished)
- Sparks v. State, 277 Ga. 72, 73(2), 586 S.E.2d 645 (2003)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…