Summary
The Supreme Court of Georgia held that a suspect invokes the right to additional, independent chemical testing under OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (3) when a reasonable officer would understand the suspect’s statement as a request for such testing. The Court rejected and overruled the Court of Appeals’ “reasonably could” standard, adopting a “reasonably would” standard instead. The judgment was reversed and remanded for reconsideration of the defendant’s ineffective-assistance claim under the proper standard.
Holdings
- A DUI suspect invokes the right to additional, independent chemical testing when the suspect's words, viewed in context and under the surrounding circumstances, would reasonably be understood by a law-enforcement officer as an expression of a desire for such testing. The Court rejected the Court of Appeals' "reasonably could" standard in favor of a "reasonably would" standard.
- The statutory phrase "justifiable failure or inability to obtain an additional test" refers to the officer's failure or inability to obtain the test, and the failure is unjustifiable when a reasonable officer would understand that the suspect requested independent testing but nevertheless ignores that request.
- The Court of Appeals was not barred from reconsidering the validity of the "reasonably could" standard merely because that standard existed when Henry was tried. The Supreme Court could overrule Ladow and its progeny in the ineffective-assistance appeal.
Questions Presented
- What standard governs whether a DUI suspect invoked the statutory right to additional, independent chemical testing under OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (3)?
- Whether the Georgia Court of Appeals could reconsider and reject its prior "reasonably could" standard while evaluating Henry's ineffective-assistance claim.
- Whether the State's failure to obtain additional independent testing is justifiable when a reasonable officer would not understand the suspect's statement as a request for such testing.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (26)
- Ladow v. State, 256 Ga. App. 726, 728-729 (569 SE2d 572) (2002)(overruled)
- Henry v. State, 355 Ga. App. 217, 219-222 (2) (843 SE2d 884) (2020)(reversed)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 687 (104 SCt 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984)(followed)
- Esprit v. State, 305 Ga. 429, 438 (826 SE2d 7) (2019)(followed)
- Rhoden v. State, 303 Ga. 482, 486 (813 SE2d 375) (2018)(followed)
- Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506 U. S. 364, 372 (113 SCt 838, 122 LE2d 180) (1993)(followed)
- Hillman v. Johnson, 297 Ga. 609, 614 (2) (b) (774 SE2d 615) (2015)(followed)
- Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Corp., 571 U. S. 220, 227-228 (III) (A) (134 SCt 870, 187 LE2d 729) (2014)(followed)
- Davis v. United States, 512 U. S. 452, 459-461 (II) (114 SCt 2350, 129 LE2d 362) (1994)(analogized)
- Green v. State, 291 Ga. 287, 292 (4) (728 SE2d 668) (2012)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…