R.L. Turner Corporation v. Town of Brownsburg

963 N.E.2d 453 (Ind. 2012) · Supreme Court of Indiana · March 9, 2012 · No. 32S01-1109-PL-573

Summary

The Indiana Supreme Court held that a trial court retains authority to consider a prevailing governmental defendant’s post-judgment petition for attorneys’ fees. The court concluded that such a petition is collateral to the merits and is not governed by the time limits for motions to correct error or motions for relief from judgment. The court also held that the trial court’s award did not require separately stated special findings and affirmed the award of fees to the Town of Brownsburg.

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not lose subject-matter or personal jurisdiction merely because it had entered final judgment. The validity of the post-judgment fee proceeding was governed by procedural rules and doctrines protecting finality, not by jurisdictional principles.
  2. A petition for attorneys' fees is not subject to the time limits governing motions to correct error under Trial Rule 59(C) or motions for relief from judgment under Trial Rule 60(B), because a fee petition concerns a collateral matter and does not disturb the merits of the judgment.
  3. An order awarding 'costs' does not itself grant or deny attorneys' fees because, under Indiana law, costs ordinarily means filing fees and statutory witness fees and excludes attorneys' fees.
  4. The fee-shifting statutes did not require the trial court to make detailed express special findings before awarding attorneys' fees. In the absence of a proper request for special findings or an express statutory or rule-based requirement, the trial court's grant of the Town's fee petition was adequate as to form and constituted an implicit legal conclusion that the statutory standard was met.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court lacked jurisdiction to award attorneys' fees after entering a final judgment dismissing Turner's claims.
  2. Whether the Town's post-judgment petition for attorneys' fees was an untimely motion to correct error or motion for relief from judgment.
  3. Whether the trial court was required to enter express special findings that Turner's claims or defenses were frivolous, unreasonable, groundless, or litigated in bad faith before awarding attorneys' fees.
  4. Whether the record supported the award of attorneys' fees.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (19)

  • Emergency Physicians of Indianapolis v. Pettit, 714 N.E.2d 1111 (Ind. Ct. App.), adopted in part, 718 N.E.2d 753 (Ind. 1999)(followed)
  • Turner v. State, 953 N.E.2d 1039 (Ind. 2011)(followed)
  • K.S. v. State, 849 N.E.2d 538 (Ind. 2006)(followed)
  • Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc., 637 N.E.2d 1282 (Ind. 1994)(followed)
  • Blanck v. Indiana Department of Correction, 829 N.E.2d 505 (Ind. 2005)(followed)
  • LinkAmerica Corp. v. Albert, 857 N.E.2d 961 (Ind. 2006)(followed)
  • J.I. Case Co. v. Sandefur, 245 Ind. 213, 197 N.E.2d 519 (1964)(followed)
  • State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. John, 751 N.E.2d 657 (Ind. 2001)(followed)
  • Wiley v. McShane, 875 N.E.2d 273 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007)(followed)
  • Van Winkle v. Nash, 761 N.E.2d 856 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 19.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…