Summary
The Iowa Supreme Court reversed a district court judgment granting Worthwhile Wind, LLC vested rights to continue developing a commercial wind energy project under preexisting county law. The court held that the developer lacked vested rights because it had not obtained a permit or other formal governmental authorization for the project. The court also addressed the bad-faith exception to the time-of-decision rule and concluded, on the portion provided, that the county had not shown the requisite illegality and improper purpose.
Holdings
- Worthwhile did not acquire vested rights to complete the commercial wind-energy project because it never obtained a permit, formally approved plat, or other official governmental authorization to proceed with construction or operation of the project.
- Worth County did not act in bad faith in adopting the new wind-energy ordinance because Worthwhile failed to establish both illegality and an improper purpose.
- The vested-rights and bad-faith exceptions are directed to claims arising from administrative-executive decisions and do not, standing alone, divest the county of legislative authority to enact new land-use regulations in a previously unzoned area.
Questions Presented
- Whether Worthwhile Wind acquired vested rights to complete its commercial wind-energy project under the zoning and regulatory regime existing before the county's moratorium and ordinance.
- Whether Worth County acted in bad faith by adopting the moratorium and new wind-energy ordinance to frustrate Worthwhile's proposed project.
- Whether the district court properly ordered that Worthwhile could complete the project under pre-moratorium law.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (20)
- Graziano v. Bd. of Adjustment, 323 N.W.2d 233, 236-37 (Iowa 1982)(followed)
- Quality Refrigerated Servs., Inc. v. City of Spencer, 586 N.W.2d 202, 204, 206-08 (Iowa 1998)(followed)
- U.S. Cellular Corp. v. Bd. of Adjustment, 589 N.W.2d 712, 717-18 (Iowa 1999)(followed)
- Geisler v. City Council, 769 N.W.2d 162, 166-68 (Iowa 2009)(followed)
- Ackman v. Bd. of Adjustment, 596 N.W.2d 96, 101, 104 (Iowa 1999)(followed)
- Kasparek v. Johnson Cnty. Bd. of Health, 288 N.W.2d 511, 518 (Iowa 1980) (en banc)(followed)
- Keller v. City of Council Bluffs, 66 N.W.2d 113, 119 (Iowa 1954)(followed)
- Board of Supervisors v. Paaske, 98 N.W.2d 827, 830-31 (Iowa 1959)(followed)
- Crow v. Board of Adjustment, 288 N.W. 145, 146-47 (Iowa 1939)(followed)
- City of New Hampton v. Blayne-Martin Corp., 594 N.W.2d 40, 45 (Iowa 1999)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…