Nelson v. Shake

82 S.W.3d 914 (Ky. 2002) · Supreme Court of Kentucky · August 22, 2002

Summary

The Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Rick B. Nelson’s petition for a writ of prohibition concerning his indictment for first-degree rape and first-degree unlawful imprisonment. The court held that Kentucky Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.06 postpones proceedings beginning with arraignment and does not prevent a grand jury from returning an indictment while a competency hearing is pending. It further held that the district court lost jurisdiction upon issuance of the felony indictment, leaving the circuit court as the proper forum for any competency determination.

Court
Supreme Court of Kentucky
Jurisdiction
Kentucky
Decision date
August 22, 2002
Procedural posture
Appeal as a matter of right from the Court of Appeals' denial of Nelson's petition for a writ of prohibition.
Precedential value
Published Kentucky Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Rick B. Nelson
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal proceduregrand jurystatutory interpretationappellate procedurepreliminary hearing

Practice areas

criminal procedurecompetency to stand trialgrand jury proceedingsappellate procedurewrit of prohibition

Questions Presented

  1. Whether RCr 8.06's postponement of "all proceedings" prevents a grand-jury session from proceeding before a competency hearing is held.
  2. Whether the district court retained jurisdiction to conduct a competency hearing after the grand jury returned a felony indictment.
  3. Whether Nelson was entitled to a writ of prohibition barring further prosecution under the indictment.

Holdings

  1. RCr 8.06 postpones trial-court proceedings beginning with arraignment and does not prevent a grand jury from returning an indictment before the defendant's competency is determined.
  2. The district court was divested of jurisdiction over the matter once the grand jury returned the felony indictment; any competency hearing must be conducted in the circuit court.
  3. Nelson was not entitled to a writ of prohibition because the indictment was not invalidated by the pending competency order and the district court lacked jurisdiction after indictment.

Key quotations

A proceeding of the Grand Jury does not fall within RCr 8.06 because the competency of an individual is irrelevant to indictment. (916)
The district court lost jurisdiction over this matter when the Grand Jury issued the indictment. (917)

Factual background

Nelson was charged with first-degree rape and first-degree unlawful imprisonment and obtained a district-court order setting a competency hearing. Before the hearing occurred, the Jefferson County Grand Jury returned an indictment on the charges. The district court declined to conduct the competency hearing after concluding that the indictment had divested it of jurisdiction, while the circuit court denied Nelson's motion to dismiss the indictment.

Procedural history

Nelson was indicted by the Jefferson County Grand Jury for first-degree rape and first-degree unlawful imprisonment while a district-court competency hearing was pending. The circuit court denied his motion to dismiss the indictment, and the Court of Appeals denied his petition for a writ of prohibition. The Supreme Court of Kentucky affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…