Margaret Lynn Owen v. Kenneth Whiteside Owen

Owen · Supreme Court of Mississippi · May 10, 2002 · No. No. 2002-CA-00995-SCT

Summary

The Mississippi Supreme Court reviewed the remand proceedings in a divorce case involving equitable distribution of marital property under the Ferguson factors. The court held that the chancery court failed to provide adequate legal conclusions supporting its continued 60/40 division of marital assets and reversed and remanded for a new equitable distribution. The court also remanded a $5,000 offset judgment related to property allegedly not produced for sale because the valuation and calculation were insufficiently explained.

Holdings

  1. The chancellor addressed the applicable Ferguson factors and made factual findings, but failed to provide conclusions of law explaining how those factors supported leaving the 60/40 division unchanged. The judgment therefore had to be reversed and remanded for a new equitable-distribution analysis.
  2. The $5,000 judgment had to be reversed and remanded because the chancellor did not provide a detailed analysis showing how the amount was calculated or how the Mercedes, camera equipment, and Jaguar factored into the award.
  3. The chancellor erred in admitting the Jaguar repair estimate without expert testimony.
  4. The chancellor was permitted to credit Kenneth's testimony over Margaret's testimony because credibility determinations are within the chancellor's role as factfinder, but the Jaguar's role in the $5,000 judgment still required clarification on remand.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the chancellor complied with the prior remand by applying the Ferguson factors and explaining the continued 60/40 division of marital property through findings of fact and conclusions of law.
  2. Whether the $5,000 judgment imposed against Margaret to offset property allegedly not produced for public sale was supported by a sufficiently detailed analysis.
  3. Whether the chancellor erred by admitting a repair estimate for the Jaguar without expert testimony.
  4. Whether the chancellor could find that the Jaguar was damaged while in Margaret's possession based on Kenneth's testimony.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (21)

  • Owen v. Owen, 798 So. 2d 394 (Miss. 2001)(followed)
  • Reddell v. Reddell, 696 So. 2d 287, 288 (Miss. 1997)(followed)
  • Carrow v. Carrow, 642 So. 2d 901, 904 (Miss. 1994)(followed)
  • Savelle v. Savelle, 650 So. 2d 476, 479 (Miss. 1995)(followed)
  • Hemsley v. Hemsley, 639 So. 2d 909, 914-915 (Miss. 1994)(followed)
  • Richardson v. Riley, 355 So. 2d 667, 668 (Miss. 1978)(followed)
  • Lauro v. Lauro, 847 So. 2d 843, 847 (Miss. 2003)(followed)
  • Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So. 2d 921, 928 (Miss. 1994)(followed)
  • Chamblee v. Chamblee, 637 So. 2d 850, 863-864 (Miss. 1994)(followed)
  • Craft v. Craft, 825 So. 2d 605, 614 (Miss. 2002)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…